In Ed Hubbard’s blog titled Our
Health Care Dilemma, posted on Big Jolly Politics, the issues being
discussed are the problems with Obamacare and several solutions that could be
implemented instead. Hubbard is summarizing one of Holman Jenkins, Jr.’s articles
in his column in the Wall Street Journal. I believe that the author is
intending to attract readers that are citizens of voting age, most likely
belonging to the middle- and lower classes. Hubbard believes that Americans
need to take more personal responsibility for their health care and establish a
doctor-patient relationship that would allow a free market health care system.
The current system in place not only prohibits us from choosing our own
doctor(s), but it also gives us no input into the cost or scope of services
that these doctors provide us. The middle men, or “dictators,” comprised of
private insurance companies, government agencies, hospital systems, and even
employers, give Americans basically no choice over the health care that is
received.
Obamacare puts all of the power in the hands of these middle men;
therefore, Hubbard suggests a restructuring of the current system to a free
market system. His solution involves three delivery systems. The first is
coverage for major medical issues only and ones that require high deductibles
or HSAs with the remaining cost falling to the individual. The second is a
local hospital system that is paid for by local tax dollars and serves those in
low-income families. The final is a voucher system that pays for private
insurance premiums and covers the elderly with funds from the Medicare tax.
Critics of Hubbard’s three-delivery system inject that they cherish the “middle
men” system because of its simplicity and the convenience of co-pays. Jenkins challenges
that Americans must be willing to take back personal responsibility of their
health care. And I agree. Sadly, many Americans are clueless about our current
system. Therefore, I believe it is up to our school systems and parents to
educate the youth of America about health care and its reform.
While I think that Hubbard is on the right track with his three-delivery
system, I would like to have gotten more details about the coverage of each
system. Our current health care system involves numerous loopholes and I think
that contributes to the root of the problem. People need an understandable
break-down of their coverage in order to know what is and is not covered by
their policy. I cannot even begin to count the times that I have been at a
doctor’s office, in the dark about how much I will owe at the end of my visit.
Sometimes I am presented with a small co-payment, other times I leave without
opening my wallet. I will admit that I did not read the fifty page packet that I
received in the mail after signing up for health insurance, but even if I did, I
am sure that I would not have understood or retained any of the information
provided. I think most people will agree with that. Spell it out for me in a
short, bulleted list that leaves nothing to the imagination.
Overall, I think Hubbard’s article was a great read and it opened my
eyes to the alternatives that could be implemented to solve the current health
care crisis. Hubbard seems very well-versed in this issue and I take to heart
his suggestions, criticisms, and easy-to-understand outline of his reform.
No comments:
Post a Comment